LoL: Invictus Gaming vs Gen.G (BO5) - Worlds Playoffs

$18.6M Vol.$6.6M LiquidityEnds Nov 8

24h Volume: $18,258,571
Total Volume: $18,565,883
Liquidity: $6,645,457

Outcomes

54 open · 8 resolved

Game Handicap: GEN (-1.5) vs Invictus Gaming (+1.5)$462,475 Vol.
>99%34%
Game Handicap: GEN (-2.5) vs Invictus Gaming (+2.5)$720,000 Vol.
>99%62%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 3?$52,170 Vol.
>99%51%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1?$13,092 Vol.
>99%51%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2?$64,606 Vol.
>99%52%
Duration O/U 31:30$8,715 Vol.
>99%50%
Duration O/U 31:30$19,113 Vol.
>99%50%
Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 1?$3,732 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 2?$8,639 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 3?$10,152 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1?$5 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3?$997 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 1?$205 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2?$113 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2?$0 Vol.
>99%
Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3?$0 Vol.
>99%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon$0 Vol.
90%40%
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 4?$668 Vol.
72%22%
Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 4?$2,193 Vol.
72%
Duration O/U 31:30$0 Vol.
64%14%
Duration O/U 31:30$56 Vol.
64%14%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon$0 Vol.
51%0.5%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor$0 Vol.
50%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors$0 Vol.
50%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor$0 Vol.
50%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon$0 Vol.
50%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors$0 Vol.
50%
Any Player Quadra Kill$0 Vol.
50%0.5%
Any Player Penta Kill$0 Vol.
50%0.5%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor$0 Vol.
50%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon$0 Vol.
50%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors$0 Vol.
50%
Any Player Penta Kill$0 Vol.
50%0.5%
Game 4 Winner$68,343 Vol.
50%12%
Any Player Quadra Kill$0 Vol.
50%1%
Any Player Penta Kill$0 Vol.
50%1%
Any Player Quadra Kill$0 Vol.
50%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor$0 Vol.
25%25%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors$0 Vol.
10%40%
Any Player Quadra Kill$0 Vol.
10%40%
Any Player Penta Kill$0 Vol.
10%40%
Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 2?$0 Vol.
<1%
Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 2?$0 Vol.
<1%
Total Kills Over/Under 42.5 in Game 2?$0 Vol.
<1%
Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 3?$0 Vol.
<1%
Total Kills Over/Under 42.5 in Game 3?$0 Vol.
<1%
Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 3?$0 Vol.
<1%
Total Kills Over/Under 45.5 in Game 3?$0 Vol.
<1%
Game 2 Winner$4,005,105 Vol.
<1%27%
Game 3 Winner$5,663,173 Vol.
<1%27%

Order Book

Live asks and bids

Resolution update: proposed. An outcome has been proposed and is in its challenge window with the UMA optimistic oracle.

This market refers to the LoL Semifinal 2 match between Invictus Gaming and Gen.G in the Worlds Playoffs, initially scheduled for November 7, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET. This market will resolve to "Invictus Gaming" if Invictus Gaming win the match against Gen.G. This market will resolve to "Gen.G" if Gen.G win the match against Invictus Gaming. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before November 21, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of November 7, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.